And a feature that doesn't get used much might not be very useful (what they assumed), or it may be a critical feature with a narrow but important use case. Frequent use of a feature might indicate that users are finding it really valuable (which is what they assumed), but it could also indicate that it is poorly labeled (thus people click because they think it is something else) or that the spacing in the UI is causing a lot of misclicks (which was the case in many circumstances). I know a guy who used to work at MS, and he said that a good portion of the time, what they thought they were learning from telemetry was actually wrong. Companies like MS don't want open user forums, because they don't like to hear that they are wrong, so they feel like they need telemetry to get this information. Part of the reason telemetry collection is more common with proprietary software than open source software is that users of open source software tend to be very willing to share their opinions, without even being asked, so long as you provide a place for them to do it. Neither of those is really good for mastering though, so I do want to be able to use Audacity (or a fork) without a bunch of extra garbage coming along for the ride.Īnd yeah, telemetry is actually not that useful, if you use good design practices, like talking to your users. Last month I discovered LMMS and Helm, which are pulling me back in. I used to use Rosegarden for sequencing and synth audio "rendering". Sadly, it has been a while since I've had time to do any of that, but the last time I used Audacity, I found it's synth capabilities to be lacking (or at least, sufficiently hard to use that it wasn't worth my time). I use other software for synth and Audacity for mixing/mastering. The current version (3.0.2) does not support data collection any data of any kind and has no networking features enabled.īeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback. In the meantime, the Privacy Policy doesn't actually come into force until the next release of Audacity (3.0.3). We will be publishing a revised version shortly. We do understand that unclear phrasing of the Privacy Policy and lack of context regarding introduction has led to major concerns about how we use and store the very limited data we collect. Error Reporting - an opt-in feature for users to send error reports to usĪs mentioned in the Compliance with Law Enforcement above, we take steps so that the IP address we collect is non-identifiable after 24 hours.Automatic Updates - checking to see if there is a new version available.This is necessary for two features being introduced in the next version of Audacity: GDPR classifies an IP address as something that potentially counts as 'personal data', which is why we use that term in the Privacy Policy. We are working with our legal team to revise our privacy policy to more clearly communicate the above points and our intent. Offline Use - The Privacy Policy does not apply to offline use of the application.Jurisdiction Requirements - We operate in many countries around the world and this is a standard policy requirement for providing services in many jurisdictions, regardless of the depth of data collected or nature of service.Limited Window - After 24 hours the IP address being collected is irretrievably lost.Compelled by Court - Data is not shared upon an agency request we will do so only if compelled by a court of law in a jurisdiction that we serve. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |